Send letters to Communities magazine, PO Box 169, Masonville, CO 80541-0169. Your letter may be lightly edited or shortened. Thank you!
Dear Communities:
We really appreciate your magazine here. It's a refreshing, forward-thinking,
almost entrepreneurial publication, in that you show the great range of
communities out there, offer practical insights about many wide-ranging aspects
of community living, and turn abstract concepts about community into useful
how-to advice. This was especially true of your issue on "Sustainable Building
& Design" (#95, Summer '97.) Thank you.
Father Seraphim
Holy Protection Monastery
Geneva, Nebraska
Dear Communities:
I noticed the anecdote in your "Food Fight!" article (Fall '97) about
The Farm and the "gaseous emissions" of our soybeans. Well, if you don't cook
'em well enough, that's what happens! Stephen Gaskin [founder of The Farm
and its former spiritual leader] used to say: "How do you tell the
difference between a pessimist and an optimist? The pessimist smells beans and
says, `Oh oh, farts!' The optimist smells farts and says, 'Ahh, beans!'"
I also think that, despite the non-denominational stance in your story, you
made the vegan case about as well as I've ever seen it. There are so
many reasons to quit running our grains and beans through animals before
eating them. However, at The Farm we always said that nothing dietary was worth
getting uptight about, so I thoroughly appreciated your humorous, mind-opening
approach to the topic. One of Stephen's stories about the master Suzuki Roshi
involved a Zen student who was particularly obnoxious and evangelistic about
vegetarianism. So Suzuki Roshi invited the student out to dinner, ordered a big
steak, and proceeded to devour it in front of him - the Zen master's way of
illustrating the old saying, "What comes out of your mouth is more important
than what goes in."
Michael Traugot
The Farm
Summertown, Tennessee
Dear Communities:
I greatly I enjoy Communities magazine and find it very useful.
However, I feel that the fiction story, "Food Fight!," in the Fall '97 issue on
food ("Breaking Bread in Community") while well executed, was not a good
idea for the magazine. I personally read Communities for real-world
information on techniques, strategies, and lifestyles in other communities, as
well as for more general information of use to intentional communities. As
fiction, I don't feel "Food Fight!" was successful because it spent so much
time imparting information. As fact, I don't feel it was successful because its
being wrapped in fiction made the article longer, less direct, and less
precise. I would have much preferred an article on food choices, and there
appeared to be some excellent information in the story that could have been
used for that instead.
While I enjoy fiction, there are many venues for it already, and I don't feel
it furthers the goals of community-builders and members for Communities
to become one of them. In my mind, the exception would be if an unusually
skilled writer of short stories who was greatly experienced with community were
to be able to write a piece that did not try to impart any information, but
which revealed the very realistic emotional experience of one or more
characters within a community, thus helping readers to frame ideas about
personal emotional needs within community. Such a piece would, I expect, be
extremely difficult to do well.
Luc Reid
Haddonfield, New Jersey
Movement groups may reprint with permission. Please direct inquiries to Communities, PO Box 169, Masonville, CO 80541-0169, (970) 593-5615.